Galleries

Do you snoot II?

A blue ring octopus shot with a snoot

As underwater photographers we tend to take what amounts to specialized studio lights down to our underwater studios, also known as the dive site de jour. A fairly common underwater setup has one or two strobes mounted on arms that allow the strobes to be positioned either closer to or farther away from the housing that holds the camera that we are shooting underwater.

If we were shooting topside, by moving the strobes off the camera we would find that we are able to better control the amount and quality of light that is hitting the subject. In topside shooting, generally we get better images if the strobe is not on top of the camera. Joe McNally, a well known studio photographer says: “Any light that originates at the camera is unflattering because you are literally throwing light at your subject.” You are not making a picture you are reducing your camera to the level of a copy machine.

Underwater, we find that moving the strobes off of the top of the camera housing helps us cut down or eliminate back scatter. The water we dive in whether it is fresh water or salt water generally has particles in it so if we are not careful we can highlight all the particulate in the water. Thus if our light source is coming from the camera, that great fish portrait we thought we got, looks like a fish in a snow storm because we illuminated the backscatter and maybe the fish. Yes, some back scattter can be cleaned up in post, but it is generally much better to reduce or eliminate the back scatter while we are shooting so we don’t have to spend hours in post trying to fix it, if it is fixable at all.

In general, underwater we re-position the strobes depending on how close the subject is to the camera. If we are shooting wide angle, the bigger the scene, the farther out to the side we position the strobes. The closer the action is to the camera, the closer we tend to bring the strobes in to the housing unless we are doing inward lighting for instance. (Inward lighting is turning the strobe heads in toward the camera so that the cone of light coming out of the strobes only lights the subject with the edge of the cone of light).

Topside photographers have long used multiple light sources and also use light shaping tools to help them manage the light resources that they use to create images. When I first started hearing the lingo of studio photographers I started to wonder if I would ever understand it, let alone understand what the various tools of the trade did and how they were used. The first time I heard a description of how to get a shot using two soft boxes, a rim light, barn doors and a snoot, I though oh boy this is going to take a while to figure all of this out. Well that is true, with any light shaping device there is a learning curve. Joe McNally’s book “The Moment it Clicks” is a pretty good book on understanding some of the lingo and concepts of shaping the light for topside photographers. According to Joe: “A snoot is any device that forms a tube around your light source to funnel it and make it more directional.” p. 28 n.2.

Why would we want to make light more directional when we are shooting underwater? Usually it is because the background that the critter we found is in either a confusing background or one that detracts from the image.

Hypselodoris bullockii shot a few moments later with a snoot

For underwater photographers snoots come in about 3 different varieties, all of which are designed to make the light that comes out of your strobe more directional. The simplest designed snoots look like a funnel from your kitchen that attaches to the front element of your strobe. A slight refinement to that design has an internal laser aiming light. Cool more technology, another battery to carry. At the time I first bought a snoot, the snoot with the laser aiming device would not fit my strobe. So I went with the simple funnel design.

Snoot with restricting cone on the left
Snoot with restricting cone attached

A somewhat more complicated design is the snoot made by Retra. In addition to providing the underwater photographer a variety of sizes and shapes of light that come out of the snoot, Retra also adds a lens that helps focus the light. One aspect of the Retra snoot that is obvious even when you first pick it up is its weight. It weighs a lot more than the other snoots on the market. Underwater, weight can be compensated for using float arms or floats, but it is something that you will want to try to compensate for otherwise you could find that it is difficult to have your rig balanced which can add another layer of difficulty to the project of shooting with a snoot. The blue ring octopus above was shot with a Retra snoot. As you can see Retra makes snoots for quite a few strobes.

The third design for a snoot is to use optical fibers inside one or more arms that allows the photographer to bend the arm or arms to aim at the subject.

So how do you use a snoot. Generally what I was taught and what I have seen a number of underwater photographers do, is attach the snoot to the strobe on the opposite side of the rig from camera shutter release button. From there it was try to position the strobe with the snoot attached so the light comes out either as top light aimed down at the subject or at an acute angle. Aiming a snoot in this matter seemed to me somewhat akin to patting my head and rubbing my tummy. With my left hand I was trying to aim the snooted light and with my right hand I was trying to control the camera and take a picture. Once the snoot was properly aimed then snap the picture — easy right, not really.

Fortunately for me the first time I was using a snoot the dive guide who was locating the critters for us helped me aim. So assuming you have to aim the snoot by your self are there any suggestions? Yes, find a pebble or other small item at the start of the dive. Aim the snoot at the pebble and through trial and error get the snooted light to illuminate the pebble so you can take a picture. Then what you do for non-pebble subjects is use the same set up and the snooted light should be pretty close. Adjust as you take shots. On a dive site with no current and a subject that is not moving at all that approach will probably work. The problem is that to the extent we have current or we have to do much swimming to get to the next subject there is a pretty good chance the strobe arm with the snoot will move a bit. Since you are narrowing the cone of light it seems to me that we could spend a lot of time trying to deal with snoot positioning and a lot less time focused on the subject. Is there a solution? Perhaps.

Ask almost any engineer and they will tell you that one of the most stable shapes is a triangle. So in this set up, our snoot base starts with a triangle which uses two float arms attached together at the top with a triple clamp. The two float arms are attached to the housing by single clamps which as you can see forms a triangle using the camera housing as a base. The triple clamp at the top attaches to a short extension tube which connects to a clamp and then is attached to another extension arm. The extension tube is then attached to a clamp which is attached to the strobe. The strobe with snoot is pointed down towards the subject and once aimed the clamp attached to the snoot can be tightened so the snoot will not move. On the extension tube that is closest to the strobe you will probably need to add some floats otherwise the strobe will cause the rig to be top heavy and be constantly leaning forward. Alternatively, you could use a float arm as the last extension tube which would provide buoyancy so the strobe will be less likely to cause the rig to lean forward. The concept for this arrangement of the float arms is referred to as the “wolf” set up and was developed by Ze’ev Kirshenboim. After testing out the wolf set up I think that is provides a very stable base and it simplifies the aiming problem. Instead of having to think about aiming in three dimensions it limits the aiming to forward and backward.

What I found from experimenting with the wolf set up is that even with objects that are less than a 1/4 inch across, the aiming could be done reasonably effectively.

The image on the left is the unrestricted snoot. The image on the right is the image shot with the restictor on the snoot. For my shooting process, I think I will probably shoot without the restictor and then tighten up the shot, assuming the critter is small enough, and will use the restrictor in subsequent images. Now the water in North Texas just needs to warm up a bit and I will go back in the water.

Trying to stay neutral?

Perfect balance?
Staying in balance

I  have been shooting underwater for almost a decade and one of the challenges that I have tried to resolve is finding a one size fits all type solution to making sure my underwater camera rig was at or near neutral buoyancy.  You might think why worry about that issue;  for me the response was simple:  after a week or more of shooting it meant that a rig that was not buoyancy neutral made my arms and shoulders sore.  Towards the end of a week of shooting it seemed to me that I was not taking as many shots and missing some shots that I ordinarily would have taken.  What I have also observed is that buoyancy or lack thereof was in part dependent upon what mode of shooting I was doing.  And, it made a big difference depending upon whether I was shooting wide angle or macro. Wide angle I wanted to be as close to neutral as possible. If I was shooting macro, I could get by with being a little negative, but being positively buoyant was a real pain.

Macro in Curacao

For instance, I started out shooting mostly wide angle.   In 2010 I bought a used ikelite system off eBay which came with the standard steel handles and the ikelite arms which were also steel.   I started shooting a wide angle port with a 20mm lens on a Nikon D200 camera.  When I attached the Ds125 strobe and the Ds51 strobe, which came with my purchase, the rig was more than 3 pounds negative. 

That might not sound like a lot but after a week of shooting it was a beast to drag around.   I changed lens and went to an 8 inch dome and the rig got closer to being neutrally buoyant.

But that was until I added the focus light.  The focus light was supposed to be close to neutrally buoyant, but in reality it was negative.  The attachment hardware only compounded the problem.  But the focus light meant that if I wanted to instantly capture a scene without waiting for the lens to hunt and find focus I had no problem doing so.  Before I added the focus light there were several trips where I felt I missed interesting shots because the camera would not focus quickly enough.   It was time to go back to the drawing board again. 

My next move was to add carbon fiber arms to the rig to replace the steel arms when they became available.  That was a good move and got my rig for wide angle to less than a pound negative which made things much better.  I used 4 Nauticam carbon fiber arms, two on each side and that got me to a good place until I added a video light and upgraded to an ikelite housing for the D800.  My solution was to alternate, shoot still with the focus light on one dive and then on other dives remove the focus light and replace it with the video light and shoot video.  It was not ideal, but I made it work. 

Then I got interested in shooting macro.  I had one flat port which would work with either a 105mm lens or a 60mm lens.  I liked the 60 mm lens because my old eyes adapted to shooting with it much easier. 

The problem was that with the float arms and the 60mm lens and the flat port now made my rig very positive.  I tried taking off two float arms off but that made the rig negative.   I tried taking  off just one float arm and while the rig was close to neutral it was not well balanced.  When I changed to the 105mm lens it displaced enough air in the port so the rig was pretty close to neutral with all the float arms in place, and a focus light mounted to the rig, but not the video light.  So I shot macro with the 105mm more than with the 60mm, but even then only spent about 10% of my time shooting macro.  Wide angle remained my primary focus.  

By the time the next camera cycle came around, 2018, I had decided to change to a new housing.  I replaced the Ikelite housing and went with a Nauticam housing for a D850.  By the time I ordered the housing, two of my trusty Nauticam float arms had sprung a leak— they were over 6 years old so I figured long off of warranty.   So I added two aluminum arms and some floats with the thought that I could add or subtract floats to balance the rig and keep it neutral.  I went with the Inon 330 strobes.  

Experimenting with inward lighting and a third strobe and still using the remaining Nauticam float arms

I bought a 4 inch dome to house the 16mm lens and I bought a macro flat port to use with either the 60mm or the 105mm lens.  I also added a subsee 10 wet diopter.  And then I added a carbon fiber snoot.  What I found was the rig was a little negative with the wide angle set up.   I was slightly positive with the macro set up unless I added the diopter which made it negative, but not by much.  

After some trial and error I realized that the floats on the aluminum arms was not quite as good a solution as I had hoped.  I also decided that I wanted to try shooting some splits which would require a bigger dome.  I went with a 9 inch glass dome by Zen with an extension for a 16mm to 35mm lens.  It was when I was playing with the zen dome in the pool that I began to realize just how much lift the dome and extension piece added to the rig.  Now I had yet another problem:  I could be about a pound negative if I shot the 16mm lens and about 2 pounds positive if I shot the 16mm-35mm lens in the nine inch dome.  

After experimenting in the pool I changed the orientation of the float arms so they were just extended outward instead of connected to one another

And then I happened across a description of float arms by Kracken that were adjustable.   I contacted several distributors about purchasing a pair, but they were not easy to find.  Finally I contacted Mike Bartick who I met in the Philippines a few months before and thankfully Mike came through with a pair just in time for my trip to Tonga and Fiji.   Before leaving for my trip, I had to try out the arms in the pool.  

The valve, which is the shinny silver part on the right of the float above, is used to allow water to be added to the float arm. The value is unidirectional so you should give some thought to how you mount the float arms to your rig.  I mounted them closet to my housing.  I found that sometimes it was helpful to have the inflow valve mounted away from the housing so it was easier to add water to the arm.  I suspect that regardless of how you mount the arms to your rig there will be a certain amount of personal preference that should guide how you set up your rig.  I did not find any differences in adding fresh water at the pool or salt water to the float arms in Tonga or Fiji that made any difference.   

Shooting the 9 inch dome with no strobes and the Kracken float arms, just add a little water to the float arms and the rig is neutral.  Cool, shoot whale shots and split shots no problem with the Kracken float arms.   Add the strobes and the focus light, no problem, don’t add as much water to the float arms and shoot away.   Want to switch to the 16mm and shoot sharks in Bega or soft corals on the Rainbow reef, no problem, just add a little bit of water to each float and shoot away.  And now the other nice discovery, want to shoot either the 60 mm or the 105mm behind the flat port with or without the diopter, not a problem.  Use the Kracken adjustable arms to adjust to the rig.  

One of the things I do appreciate about the Kracken float arms that does not directly relate to shooting is that when you are done with the trip, you can easily empty the water from the arms and dry them out so they don’t weigh much when they are packed away for the next flight.  With as much camera gear and dive gear as I carry, I am always trying to lighten the load even if it is only by a few ounces here and there.

Being able to unscrew the end of the Kracken float arm makes it easy to empty and dry out before flying home

So at least for now I think I have found a solution to the problem of trying to balance the rig and getting it to neutral buoyancy so I can go back and forth between wide angle, macro and super macro. 

Want to go to Tonga?

Yep, it is a long way to go to Tonga from Dallas Texas. About 3.5 hours to LA, then 10 hours overnight to Fiji. And, then another 2 hours from Nadi in Fiji to Vanavu Tonga. When spread over a couple of days it was not too bad. Two checked bags, and I carried on the plane a roller board and a backpack. I did manage to get the dive equipment and camera gear to Tonga. And, thanks to the nice folks at Fiji airways it all arrived on time and without any breakage. Hurray.

When we got off the plane in Tonga it was pretty warm, mid 80’s and sunny. You could tell, Tonga gets a lot of rain, all of the plants were very green and lush. The airport in Neiafu Tonga is pretty small. Two people to check passports. Luggage pickup was efficient, the baggage handlers just passed it through a portal in the wall. Even with a plane full of people, and we were the last to get off the plane, it only took about 1/2 and hour. With a 15 minute ride we were at the house where 6 of us stayed. We unpacked and then went to dinner in town. There are about 3 restaurants in town. An Italian restaurant, a Spanish bar, and a pizza restaurant. Over the week we ate at all three and we favored the Italian restaurant.

After dinner I put the camera and underwater housing together. I put the 16-35mm lens on and added the zen 9 inch glass dome. Ugh, was it ever heavy. We didn’t have to check the weather, it was windy and overcast.

We got to the boat the next morning. The boat was a single engine aluminum hull dive boat. Thankfully it had good cover. By about 7:30 a.m. we were on the water and heading out to the far end of the bay. The seas were pretty rough, we had 6-10 foot waves and there were a lot of waves. Half the passengers were chumming the fish, and sometimes on multiple occasions even after taking Dramamine. I told one the passengers we should rename the boat. the vomit comet; my comment got a chuckle from the non- chummers, but otherwise was too close in time.

Trying to find whales in rough seas was a challenge. We found a few and did a couple of drops to swim with the whales, but got relatively few shots. Anybody who thinks that humpback whales swim slowly is mistaken. Michael Phelps in fins on his best day might be able to do a short maximum effort of 3 miles per hour. Whales can do 5 mph or more depending on what they are doing. So for us old geezers with fins on our best hope is that the captain drops us in front of where the whales are going to swim by and the whales then swim by, and if we work hard we can get left behind by the whales in about 10-20 seconds.

I learned a couple of lessons the first day. My favorite fins which work great for scuba diving are not the best when trying to just snorkel with whales. Paddle type fins, particularly paddles with little flexibility spend a lot of time in the air particularly when there are big waves. When they are in the air they don’t do you much good. So I wound up swimming on my side most of the time. Talk about a great way to swallow half the ocean. That snorkel often became a big straw. When I come back, next time, I will bring the old split fins that are really flexible and will stay in the water all of the time. That way the snorkel will not fill with water as often in big seas.

The second lesson I learned was that in rough water where you are having to do a lot of swimming, pushing a 9 inch glass dome is a challenge and was probably a bad idea. Now don’t get me wrong, having the ability to zoom in to 35 mm from 16mm is helpful; and using a rectilinear lens is a lot of fun underwater. But, pushing the weight and the girth of the dome through the water was quite the resistance workout. After two days of rough seas and pushing the dome, I decided to change the port to a 4 inch port and just use my trusty 16mm lens.

David takes a break from shooting to watch a mother and baby whale

On the boat ride out to the whale grounds on the third day, with my 4 inch port attached, I told one of our group that what I wanted was an old slow whale who was more interested in napping than chasing about here and there. Well I kind of got my wish.

We did a couple of jumps with a few single whales and then we had lunch. During lunch the captain told us that we were going to try to swim with a mom and baby whale but we were the fifth boat in line. The captain told us he was trying to talk a couple of the other captains in to letting us go ahead of them because we had less available time on the water. They agreed so we jumped up to boat two. So we alternated with another boat, they had four in the water then we had a group in the water. Some people say that having a long time with whales is magical. I don’t really subscribe to that theory. I did find it was a lot easier to shoot images of the mother and baby whale then the momma whale was napping. There were a couple of times when I seemed to drift in closer to the whales than our guide wanted. He would pull on my fin and I would back up a bit. And of course, I was wishing I had left the 16-35mm lens and the nine inch dome on because there was not much pushing of the dome through the water.

Mom pushing her baby to the surface to breath

All told we had about 45 minutes in the water with the mom and baby whale. Compared to the prior days and the succeeding two days, it was a great day.

Would I go back, probably, but I would probably go back earlier in the season to see some heat runs and maybe have some calmer seas.

Is it time to go back to Fiji?

The diversity of animal life and the beautiful soft corals in Fiji are more than enough to drag me back to Fiji. But this time I am going back to try to capture images and footage of humpback whales. Will we be successful in getting close enough to the whales to get anything interesting, I don’t know, but I’m betting we get some pretty long swims. For this trip I have added a 9 inch optical glass dome in order to try to capture a few split shots (half above the water and half below the water). Pushing that much glass through the water will probably be quite a work out. Hopefully we will come back with something interesting to see. Stay tuned….

How should underwater photographers treat the underwater environment?

Mantis shrimp
Mantis shrimp

Less than one percent of the world’s population holds a diver’s certification card or “c” card.  That “c” card potentially unlocks the possibility of seeing and photography wild life on the seventy percent of the planet that is covered in water.  With the great possibilities that a “c” card provides comes great responsibilities, particularly for underwater photographers.  

Our collegues who make images of wildlife on land for the most part can count the number of animals that they come across on any given day without much difficulty, unless perhaps they are creating images of a great migration such as you might find in parts of Africa.  In contrast, when we venture into the ocean, underwater photographers will quickly lose count of the animals that they will see.  Corals are animals.  Sponges are animals.   Tunicates are animals.  And, that does not even include the fish, mollusks and cephalopods to name but a few of what most people would consider as the animals that live in our oceans.   So are there rules that underwater photographers should follow to avoid over-stressing the animals that live under water?  I think so. 

Rule number 1:  Try not to touch anything but water.

Some of the creatures that live in the ocean are really small.  It would be very easy to put a fin down on a creature without even seeing them.  Consider the plight of many nudibranchs  (a mollusck without a shell or sea slug). One that comes to mind in particular is commonly referred to as Picachu.  It is not uncommon for a Picachu to live on the sand and his coloring is designed to make it hard to see him crawling along in the sand.  So if you lay down on the sand to take a picture of some other creature, and you fail to see a Picachu, squish and no more Picachu. 

On the other hand, the rational for this rule is also grounded in the safety of the underwater photographer.  Consider this: a blue ringed octopus may be less than 20 centimeters in length, but has some of the most powerful neurotoxin — tetrodotoxin in the world.  The average life expectancy after a bite by a blue ringed octopus is about 8 minutes, and if you survive to reach the surface and are transported to a hospital, you may spend about two weeks on a respirator, assuming you survive.  Even the skin of the blue ringed octopus has tetrodotoxin, which if you touch it might not kill you, but could make you very sick.

Blue ringed octopus in a clam shell

Picachu a very delicate nudibranch

    Rule number 2: Try not to overstress animals with too many flash shots

Some animals are relatively tolerant of strobes firing near them.  Some are not.  Nevertheless, watch for any signs of distress in the animal and stop shooting if the animal is adversely reacting.   If the animal starts to move away from you, let it go.  Don’t chase after it.  You might get a very bad surprise.   Many animals underwater have stings and bites that can harm the photographer.  If they start to move away let them go.  For example I got two shots of a scorpion fish before he moved.  Scorpion fish also carry a risk of venom in their dorsal fins, so again – don’t touch them.

A scorpion fish
Scorpion fish

Rule number 3: Mind your gear

Diving is exciting, just try to keep things under control
Diving is exciting, just try to keep things under control

Many animals that live underwater grow extremely slowly.  A single misplaced fin kick may kill or severely harm some creatures that live underwater. Take for instance, a vase sponge.  Vase sponges  can be incredibly beautiful, yet if a diver or underwater photographer is not paying attention and either mis-kicks or drags   a camera across the sponge it can be killed or severely harmed. 

Hopefully by following these rules, underwater photographers can avoid injuring the creatures of the sea and themselves. 

Have you seen a fresh water jelly fish?

Not long ago I was having lunch at a local burger stand when one of the owners of a near by scuba park came by to say hello and to ask if I was going to be out at the park soon because some fresh water jelly fish had been seen. He also wanted to know if I would take a picture or two of the fresh water jelly fish and share it with the park. I said I hoped to be out at the park in a week or so and I would endeavor to take a picture or two since I had never seen a fresh water jelly fish before. And of course I would be glad to share anything I was able to shoot because I have always thought it was pretty important to have a good scuba park nearby for divers to work on diving skills.

So in between I did a little bit of looking on the internet to see what had been written about fresh water jelly fish. I also gave some thought to whether I ever remember seeing a fresh water jelly fish in the scuba ranch or the predecessor clear springs scuba park. I have been going out to the park for over a decade so I looked through several images and racked my memory and concluded that I had never seen a fresh water jelly out at the park or anywhere else for that matter. So I started looked through the internet and discovered there is a fair amount that has been written about fresh water jelly fish. For one thing, they are an invasive species that are thought to have come from China from the Yangtze River. Now how they got to the United States is a bit unclear. For my imagination, I suppose it’s another bait bucket transfer. They probably hitched a ride on the bottom of a ship that made its way from China to the Great Lakes perhaps much like zebra muscles, another invasive species.

So the next thing I wondered was how big are these critters? Well it turns out not too big. A fully grown adult is about the size of a quarter. My next inquiry, was well am I going to likely get stung trying to take a picture of a fresh water jelly? After a little reading it sounded like even though fresh water jelly’s have stinging cells similar to their saltwater cousins, it appears that their small size meant that the stinging cells are not able to penetrate human skin. Yippee.

So then my thought was what lens and port combination should I use. I quickly eliminated a wide angle lens with a dome port because while it would be easy to shoot the critter that way it would diminish the size of an already small critter. So my next thought was to use a 105 mm macro lens. I fairly soon rejected that thought because while the 105mm lens would give me more working distance from the critter, given the relatively small amount of visibility in the lake, I feared that I might have some real challenges getting a good shot. So I started thinking about a black water dive I did in the Philippines this year and remembered that I had used a 60mm lens and had had some success shooting relatively small creatures at night that were part of the great migration each night. So I settled on the 60mm lens and added to the kit a wet diopter to magnify the critter assuming I could get a decent shot.

So I went out to the scuba ranch and started looking for jelly fish. Well I found some, most of them were down by Sisco the shark, but there were a few along the shoreline in about 15 to 20 feet of water. Trying to shoot the little guys proved to be less than easy. Similar to black water diving since the creatures are so small the tiny amount of pressure wave that can come off moving an underwater camera into position is enough to push the jelly fish around in the water column. So rule one that I learned was keep the camera in position and be ready to shoot before you find the jelly. Now the tough part, the jelly’s live in the water column so you can’t cheat and put a fin down in the bottom of the lake to stay steady. So it means that when you find a subject you have to get close, but not too close. You have to stay steady and not move and you have to hope that the critter doesn’t swim out of the frame. And of course, since I figured it would be easier to spot a critter in daylight, which was corrrect, I had to shoot with inward focused strobes in an open water column in order to create a black background. It took a while to get any workable shot, but it was an interesting experiment. I was not able to use the diopter so I have will have to go back and try again in the near future and hopefully get even closer to the subject. Be prepare to take quite a few shots to get a good useable one. And as I have found you can register your find with the USGS and there is a marine biologist who is creating a database of sittings of fresh water jelly fish. So you can register what you find. Have fun and keep shooting.

Have you been diving on the Lesleen M?

Turtle on Deck
Turtle on deck

My grandfather used to say quite often “Sonny using the right tool for the job makes all the difference.” My grandfather was a very skilled repairman who could take almost any mechanical device apart and repair it, most of the time without any schematics, diagrams or other description of the devise. When he took something apart he was very systematic. When he was done dissembling a device it looked like an engineer’s exploded schematic of the device. Of course for him the device went back together with no left over parts and almost always worked better than when he found it. Coming from my grandfather, advice about using the right tool for the project had significant meaning to me.

On the other hand, some of my family members motto has been adapt and change to meet the situation. Or if you don’t have the right tool for the job, improvise.

So I guess it is somewhat telling that one of my reoccurring nightmares is going on a trip to take pictures of whales underwater and discovering the camera rig is set up for macro or worse yet super macro. How many pictures of a whale’s eye do you need or want?

The same thought applies to ship wrecks. When I think about shooting a ship wreck I am thinking about what is the environment like where the wreck is located?

Papa doc with diver — Freeport Bahamas

Is the reef near the wreck, is the reef interesting? Has the wreck begun to grow over the wreck?

The tugboat with encrusting corals — Curacao

In preparing for a recent trip to St. Lucia I had looked on the internet to see what the most important wreck off the coast of St. Lucia was. I found some reasonably helpful information about the Lesleen M which pointed out that the Lesleen M Wreck is an old cargo ship that was sunk in 1986. The resulting artificial reef is home to numerous species of coral and aquatic life. The Lesleen M Wreck lies evenly on its keel. The wreck is approximately 165 feet long and rests at a depth of at a depth of 60 feet. From inside the engine room of the Lesleen M Wreck, there is a ladder that takes you into the cabins of the main deck. I think that is a reasonable good description of what I saw when I dove the Lesleen M.

But wouldn’t you know the day I dove the Lesleen M instead of having my wide angle lens, I had a 105 mm macro lens. So how did I adapt and adjust? I had no choice but to shoot macro. Here are few macro shots I took.

green moray in your face
Green moray in your face, Lesleen M St. Lucia

And there were a few other interesting shots…

queen angel fish on the wreck
Queen angel fish on the wreck of the Lesleen M

But alas, no pictures of what I would call an underwater wreck. I guess I will have to go back.

Do you have a favorite undersea animal?

I will admit that I have been a fan of shark week for as long as it has been on the Discovery channel. Sharks are smart. They have an incredible array of tools for finding prey. They have been on the planet for hundreds of millions of years and they have evolved to fit into many different sub-environments. For many years when I was asked what my favorite animal in the sea was, I typically would respond sharks.

This is why you wear the steel suit
This is why you wear the steel suit

Of course when I was growing up, sharks didn’t always have the best reputation. Flipper, who I watched a lot as a kid, always prevailed over any sharks that strayed into the story line of the show. Don’t get me wrong, I liked Flipper and have always been fascinated by dolphins who also seem to have awesome skills as predators. I have always found big undersea creatures to be interesting. They are necessary to ensure the health of a reef. They typically go very fast through the water.

But, sharks and dolphins share at least one trait, their relative amount of color is pretty limited. Grey and white and tan are excellent colors if you want to blend into the reef. But there are so many other colors that exist on coral reefs that I may have to change my thinking about what my favorite undersea animal is.

Eye of a peacock flounder
Eye of a peacock flounder
Nudibranchs
Never enough time

Have you been to St. Lucia?

Diving in St. Lucia turned out to be full of surprises. We went in December, 2018 and there were no crowds. We had the reef pretty much to ourselves. We dove with a shop called Scuba Steve’s because we were staying on the north end of the island. I don’t think I have been to any Caribbean island where I have seen as many octopi. On just about every dive I saw at least one octopus and on several dives I saw more than one.

An Octopu Lounging on the colorful  reef
An Octopus lounging on the colorful reef

The reef was healthy and exceptionally colorful. You would think that an octopus would be able to do a better job of camouflage than this fellow did, white and brown stands out on these sponges, but it made for a nice contrast for the picture.

Another aspect of the diving in St. Lucia that struck me was the variety of sponges and their incredible colors. There were tons of barrel sponges, vase sponges and tube sponges that added enormous color to the dives.

Tube sponges with diver
Tube sponges with diver

There is only one wreck dive that was available when we were there. Of course we got our wires crossed and we dove it the day I was shooting with a macro lens. I didn’t get any pictures per se of the wreck, but the wreck did provide a healthy environment for a variety of fish and sea critters, (including frog fish) and of course there was the nearly obligatory octopus.

queen angel fish on the wreck
Queen angel fish on the wreck

In the middle of the week we were there we did a tour of the island. We hired a guide who drove us around much of the island, which has a pretty laid back Caribbean vibe. Would I like to go back, yup, it was a very relaxed trip and they do know how to cook.

Delicate vase sponges

Have you been to Anilao?

After a 14 hour plane ride from Dallas to Seoul Korea with a few hour lay over, I was finally getting on the plane to fly to Manila. I had looked at multiple sites to tell me as much as I could digest about what to expect in Anilao in the Philippines. I was hoping I would be ready to shoot as many images as I could in 30 or so dives in 8 days. I’d watched video on youtube and vimeo. I had looked at images on several photo stock agency sites and I had read quite a few articles on diving in Anilao. I have looked at water temperature charts. I had gotten all the scuba gear serviced and had taken out and put together several times the underwater housing for my camera and strobes and lights. And, yet I was still not prepared for the substantial bio-diversity that I would find in diving in Anilao.

Sure I had read that Anilao was within the few hundred miles of where biologists had determined was the highest amount of biodiversity in the world. Of course it is one thing to read it; its another thing to see it.

Fortunately we had a guide Edgar who found the vast majority of critters that we saw. Edgar is outstanding at his job. After getting all set up and riding the boat a relatively short distance from the resort, we dropped in the water. My first thought: well now I see why we are shooting macro instead of wide angle; visibility was maybe 15 feet and where we dropped in was a sandy bottom. After making sure all of our gear was functioning we started to swim away from shore to deeper water — about 70 feet. The bottom was still sandy and yet Edgar was finding odd looking creatures and nudibranchs (Shell-less mollusks) quickly enough to keep four photographers busy shooting images. On the first day or so I was shooting a 60mm lens and going back and forth to a subsee diopter. I had only shot a diopter for less than 20 shots so I was really guessing about technique and how far or close I had to be to the subject. After a while it got easier to guess. And, with the 60mm my working distance to some of the creatures was really close 4-5 inches. Good thing most of the creatures are camouflage experts and don’t rely on speed to survive. They survive because unless you know what to look for they are so well disguised they are hard to see.

At one point Edgar turned over a star fish. It was a pretty blue star fish but on the surface pretty ordinary. But, on the underside of the star fish was a shrimp which might have been about half an inch in length.

Later in the dive Edgar found a blue ringed octopus hiding in an abandoned sea shell. Now I had read that they carry enough bio toxin to immobilized a small army. I took my chances and got in close with the diopter and snapped off a couple of quick shots and decided I needed to move away and not test my luck any further. (As I would see over the week, blue ring octopi are fairly docile, but are deserving of respect. No one had any problems with them but they still deserve a fair amount of respect and I would be the last one to hassle them). I do kinda like to develop the pictures I take and not just take them.

Towards the end of the dive we came across a lemon goby who was going in and out of what looked like an old piece of a log. The log was also adorned with other sea life, but the goby was the star with his bright yellow color.

We saw dozens of other critters during the first set of dives, most all of which I have never seen before. It was a pattern that continued the entire trip.

Have you been to the Cistern dive site in BVI?

Megan exploring Cistern Point
Megan exploring Cistern Point

The first dive we did in British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) in 2018 was at the  Cistern point off of Cooper island. We dropped down behind the boat and swam to the mooring line.  We dropped to the bottom which was at 27 feet at the mooring ball.  The area around the mooring ball was mostly sand. It looked like the cat. 5 hurricane last year had beaten up most of the hard coral. But the hard coral is slowing making a come back.

The soft corals are ok, but a bit sparse. It was a sunny day to start, but later in the dive the sun started to go behind the clouds, meaning that I had to turn up the strobes a bit .  I found quite a few large lobsters in various overhangs. They looked to be in the 5 + pound range.

Megan diving with lobster
diver with lobster

There were several dips in the ocean floor. I dropped down to see the various animals hiding in the hole in the reef. The fish seem to be making a bit of a come back. We saw several scrawled file fish. I saw one queen trigger fish.  I saw quite a few box fish and one adult barracuda.  We saw three large tarpon near a cave mouth. Inside the cave were some silversides and there were two lion fish hunting the silversides.

Later in the dives we got reasonably close to the tarpon.

Three tarpon swimming over the reef
Three tarpon swimming over the reef; its actually 15 feet of fish:  3 X 5 foot tarpon

Late in the dive we found a turtle. I took quite a few shots of him and got a few with my daughter Megan in the picture.

Megan and the turtle
Megan and the turtle

Near the end of the dive we found one spotted moray who was pretty well hidden.

At the end of the dive an eagle ray that was easily 6 ft across came through the site. He was missing a tail.

A large eagle ray swimming away from us

I swam hard for both the turtle and the eagle ray.  The turtle wasn’t too hard to catch.   The ray was pretty fast and it was hard to get close to him.

I was a bit tired after the dive since the swim back to the boat was through some surge and the wind had picked up and was blowing us away from the boat.

The new housing and strobes worked well. I took over 200 images on the one hour long dive. Maximum depth was 42 feet. Viz was maybe 50-60 feet, less at the beginning and end of the dive. Better in the middle of the dive.

Have you been diving in the Exumas Cayes in the Bahamas?

Farmers Caye in the morning
Farmers Caye in the morning

The Exhumas are a group of islands that are part of the Bahamas that begin about 30 miles of the southeaster tip of New Providence island where Nassau is located.  The Exhumas are a beautiful chain of coral islands.  On one side is the Atlantic Ocean, on the other side is the Gulf.  On the Gulf side it is easy to sail in 20+knot winds and the water is still relatively calm.  On the Atlantic side, with the same winds whip up the seas and it is easy to have 5-6 foot swells.  

By staying on the gulf side of the islands, we managed to move relatively effortlessly without getting beat to a pulp by the seas.  The diving on the gulf side, well it was relatively shallow,  but the sea life was relatively diverse.  

red tipped sea goddess nudibranch

Red tipped sea goddess nudibranch, of course shows up while I have a wide angle set up on the camera. 

The creatures also included a rather large slipper lobster, who I thought was as large as I had ever seen. 

slipper lobster
slipper lobster

For diving, it was important to be at the dive site ready to dive either on slack high or slack low tide.  Most sites are near the channels between the islands.  if you try to dive the sites without being on slack tide you are going to be doing a serious drift dive with currents ranging from 2-5 knots. Given that we were not particularly well set up for drift dives it meant that we had to time our dives well to be on slack water.  Of course in between we were able snorkel and saw eagle rays, green sea turtles and even swimming pigs and native iguanas. 

Most days early morning and sunsets were spectacular. 

sun rise Farmers Caye
sun rise Farmers Caye